IEA 126BSA 132(1) & (2)

What changed

• The words "barrister, attorney, pleader or vakil" are replaced by "advocate".
• Word "employment" is replaced by "service".
• In sub-section (2) words "referred to in the proviso to sub-section (1)" are added.

Drafting-ready

Under Section 132(1) & (2) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (formerly Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872)...

Bare act text — BSA 132(1) & (2)

(1) No advocate, shall at any time be permitted, unless with his client ’s express consent, to disclose any communication made to him in the course and for the purpose of his service as such advocate, by or on behalf of his client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he has become acquainted in the course and for the purpose of his professional service, or to disclose any advice given by him to his client in the course and for the p urpose of such service: Provided that nothing in this section shall protect from disclosure of— (a) any such communication made in furtherance of any illegal purpose; (b) any fact observed by any advocate, in the course of his service as such, showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his service. (2) It is immaterial whether the attention of such advocate referred to in the proviso to sub-section (1), was or was not directed to such fact by or on behalf of his client. Explanation.—The obligation stated in this section continues after the professional service has ceased. Illustrations. (a) A, a client, says to B, an advocate — “I have committed forgery, and I wish you t o defend me”. As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not a criminal purpose, this communication is protected from disclosure. (b) A, a client, says to B, an advocate — “I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of a forged deed on which I request you to sue”. This communication, being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure. (c) A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, an advocate, to defend him. In the course of the proceedings, B observes that an en try has been made in A ’s account book, charging A with the sum said to have been embezzled, which entry was not in the book at the commencement of his professional service. This being a fact observed by B in the course of his service, showing that a fraud has been committed since the commencement of the proceedings, it is not protected from disclosure.