Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

BSA Section 100

. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies

In one line

BSA Section 100 deals with . evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies and replaces Evidence Act 97.

Bare act text — BSA 100

100. . Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies.

When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply. Illustration A agrees to sell to B "my land at X in the occupation of Y". A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.

Frequently asked

What was BSA Section 100 in the Evidence Act?

BSA Section 100 (. Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies) replaces Section 97 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Evidence Act 97 is now BSA 100.

Still citing the Evidence Act? Convert any old section in seconds, or keep the whole case — dates, clients and sections — in one diary.

Nearby BSA sections

See all 170 BSA sections