Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

BSA Section 27

Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated

In one line

BSA Section 27 deals with relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated and replaces Evidence Act 33.

Bare act text — BSA 27

27. Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated.

Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding, or before any person authorised by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable: Provided that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest; that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine and the questions in issue were substantially the same in the first as in the second proceeding. Explanation.--A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning of this section.

What changed from the Evidence Act

  • Evidence Act 33 → BSA 27: No change except that word "that" is replaced by "and" in proviso.

Frequently asked

What was BSA Section 27 in the Evidence Act?

BSA Section 27 (Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated) replaces Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Evidence Act 33 is now BSA 27.

Still citing the Evidence Act? Convert any old section in seconds, or keep the whole case — dates, clients and sections — in one diary.

Nearby BSA sections

See all 170 BSA sections