Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
BNS Section 316
Criminal breach of trust
In one line
BNS Section 316 deals with criminal breach of trust and replaces IPC 405 (now 316(1)), IPC 406 (now 316(2)), IPC 407 (now 316(3)), IPC 408 (now 316(4)), IPC 409 (now 316(5)).
Punishment, bail and court
| Section | Offence | Punishment | Cognizable | Bailable | Triable by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 316(2) | Criminal breach of trust. | Imprisonment for 5 years, or fine, or both. | Cognizable. | Non-bailable. | Magistrate of the first class. |
| 316(3) | Criminal breach of trust by a carrier, wharfinger, etc. | Imprisonment for 7 years and fine. | Cognizable. | Non-bailable. | Magistrate of the first class. |
| 316(4) | Criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant. | Imprisonment for 7 years and fine. | Cognizable. | Non-bailable. | Magistrate of the first class. |
| 316(5) | Criminal breach of trust by public servant or by banker, merchant or agent, etc. | Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine. | Cognizable. | Non-bailable. | Magistrate of the first class. |
Source: First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The punishment column is the Schedule’s summary; the section text below is what prescribes the punishment. Classification decides procedure (arrest, bail as of right, which court), not the result of any particular case.
Bare act text — BNS 316
316. Criminal breach of trust.
(1) Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits criminal breach of trust. Explanation 1.—A person, being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) or not who deducts the employee’s contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a Provident Fund or Family Pension Fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said law, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid. Explanation 2.—A person, being an employer, who deducts the employees’ contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the Employees’ State Insurance Fund held and administered by the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation established under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said Act, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid. Illustrations. (a) A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriates them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (b) A is a warehouse-keeper Z going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (c) A, residing in Kolkata, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z’s direction. Z remits one lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’s paper. A dishonestly disobeys the directions and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (d) But if A, in illustration (c), not dishonestly but in good faith, believing that it will be more for Z’s advantage to hold shares in the Bank of Bengal, disobeys Z’s directions, and buys shares in the Bank of Bengal, for Z, instead of buying Company’s paper, here, though Z should suffer loss, and should be entitled to bring a civil action against A, on account of that loss, yet A, not having acted dishonestly, has not committed criminal breach of trust. (e) A, a revenue-officer, is entrusted with public money and is either directed by law, or bound by a contract, express or implied, with the Government, to pay into a certain treasury all the public money which he holds. A dishonestly appropriates the money. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (f) A, a carrier, is entrusted by Z with property to be carried by land or by water. A dishonestly misappropriates the property. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
(2) Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) Whoever, being entrusted with property as a carrier, wharfinger or warehouse-keeper, commits criminal breach of trust in respect of such property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
(4) Whoever, being a clerk or servant or employed as a clerk or servant, and being in any manner entrusted in such capacity with property, or with any dominion over property, commits criminal breach of trust in respect of that property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
(5) Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property in his capacity of a public servant or in the way of his business as a banker, merchant, factor, broker, attorney or agent commits criminal breach of trust in respect of that property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
What changed from the IPC
- IPC 405 → BNS 316(1): Definition presented in BNS as a sub-section.
- IPC 406 → BNS 316(2): IPC Section is included as sub-section in BNS sans heading.
- IPC 406 → BNS 316(2): The upper limit of the imprisonment is increased from three years to five years.
- IPC 407 → BNS 316(3): Section is included as sub-section in BNS sans heading.
- IPC 408 → BNS 316(4): Section is included as sub-section in BNS sans heading.
- IPC 409 → BNS 316(5): Section is included as sub-section in BNS sans heading.
Frequently asked
What was BNS Section 316 in the IPC?
BNS Section 316 (Criminal breach of trust) replaces Sections 405, 406, 407, 408, 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. IPC 405 is now BNS 316(1). IPC 406 is now BNS 316(2). IPC 407 is now BNS 316(3). IPC 408 is now BNS 316(4). IPC 409 is now BNS 316(5).
What is the punishment under BNS 316(2)?
Criminal breach of trust – punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. Under the First Schedule to the BNSS, 2023 it is cognizable and non-bailable, triable by magistrate of the first class.
What is the punishment under BNS 316(3)?
Criminal breach of trust by a carrier, wharfinger, etc – punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Under the First Schedule to the BNSS, 2023 it is cognizable and non-bailable, triable by magistrate of the first class.
What is the punishment under BNS 316(4)?
Criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant – punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Under the First Schedule to the BNSS, 2023 it is cognizable and non-bailable, triable by magistrate of the first class.
What is the punishment under BNS 316(5)?
Criminal breach of trust by public servant or by banker, merchant or agent, etc – punishable with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Under the First Schedule to the BNSS, 2023 it is cognizable and non-bailable, triable by magistrate of the first class.
Is BNS 316 bailable?
Non-bailable: BNS 316(2), 316(3), 316(4), 316(5). Bail in a non-bailable offence is at the court's discretion; the classification decides procedure, not the outcome of a particular bail application.
Still citing the IPC? Convert any old section in seconds, or keep the whole case — dates, clients and sections — in one diary.
Nearby BNS sections
- BNS 311 — Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt
- BNS 312 — Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon
- BNS 313 — Punishment for belonging to gang of robbers, etc
- BNS 314 — Dishonest misappropriation of property
- BNS 315 — Dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by deceased person at the time of his death
- BNS 317 — Stolen property
- BNS 318 — Cheating
- BNS 319 — Cheating by personation
- BNS 320 — Dishonest or fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent distribution among creditors
- BNS 321 — Dishonestly or fraudulently preventing debt being available for creditors
